| 摘 要： |
We asked 450 owners from Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway about their experiences with eight 150hp four-cylinder tractors. Here are the results. How reliable are today's tractors, which make stands out, and which problems are more commonplace? To find out the answer for 150hp, four-cylinder tractors, we asked owners from Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway about their opinion of these eight makes, which were on sale nearly ten years ago and in a group test in 2017. McCormick was originally part of this test, but there was an insufficient response to include them in the survey results. Deutz-Fahr didn't take part in the 2017 test so were left out here, too. The highest response was from Fendt (23%), John Deere and Valtra (20% each) owners. Case IH made up 12% of the responses, duly followed by New Holland users (10%), MF (7%), Claas (6%), and Kubota (just 2%). Most of the responses came from Germany (43%), Norway (25%), and the Netherlands (15%). Time constraints meant we didn't open the survey to UK and Irish readers.
我们对来自丹麦、芬兰、德国、荷兰和挪威的450名车主进行了调查，了解他们使用八款150马力四缸拖拉机的体验。以下是调查结果：如今的拖拉机可靠性如何？哪些品牌表现突出？又有哪些问题更为普遍？为了了解150马力四缸拖拉机的情况，我们向来自丹麦、芬兰、德国、荷兰和挪威的车主询问了他们对这八款车型的看法。这些车型在近十年前上市，并于2017年参与了一次集体测试。麦考密克（McCormick）最初也参与了此次测试，但由于反馈不足，最终未被纳入调查结果。道依茨-法尔（Deutz-Fahr）未参加2017年的测试，因此也被排除在外。其中，芬特（Fendt）获得最高回应率（23%），约翰迪尔（John Deere）和瓦尔特拉（Valtra）各占20%。凯斯IH（Case IH）占12%，随后是纽荷兰（New Holland）用户（10%）、MF（7%）、克拉斯（Claas，6%）以及久保田（Kubota，仅2%）。大多数受访者来自德国（43%）、挪威（25%）和荷兰（15%）。由于时间限制，我们未能向英国和爱尔兰读者开放本次调查。 |
京公网安备 11010202009788